Vermonters for a Just Peace in Palestine/Israel

Letters to Media

Home
----------------
About us
----------------
Action
----------------
Articles
----------------
Background
----------------
Events
----------------
Links
----------------
News
----------------
Letters to Media
----------------
Cartoons
----------------
Contact
----------------
Search
----------------
E-Mail Us
vtjp@vtjp.org


Letter to Valley Reporter   June 5, 2002


As the community violence between Israelis and Palestinians continues unabated, so do the comments on this page sent in by observers of the bitter struggle.

I, too, feel compelled to pitch into the discussion. I want to begin by taking up a comment of Al Raphael of Waitsfield, who said in his letter of May 23 that the views on the Palestinian-Israeli crisis voiced by Anne Bordonaro, also of Waitsfield, "may be colored by the fact that her husband is an Arab."

Exactly. How could it be otherwise? And it’s similarly inescapable that the views I will express here, on the same crisis, will be colored too: in my case by my identity as an American Jew who was born with a plain Yiddish spoon in his mouth.

The coloration of my particular Jewish identity has prompted me from early boyhood -- too precociously, perhaps -- always to sympathize first with the victims of social injustice. My parents came of age in Czarist Russia in the century before last, where Jews were subjected to periodic pogroms, to discrimination in every aspect of civic life, and to widespread despisal. My father walked all though his life, even here in America, like a man who knew those things; and I inherited from him some of that sad and sorry knowledge of the man who has been stepped on, and has had to apologize for it.

Today, when I see the word "Palestinian," I more and more think the word "Jew." The similarities and symmetries between the Jews of the past – of my father’s and my time – and the Palestinians of today are multiple and astonishing. One people, Jewish, was persecuted savagely, especially in the 1930's and ‘40's, and now, today, the other people, Palestinian, is experiencing a parallel disaster, including fierce and comprehensive assaults on its physical and civic life. One people sought sanctuary and security through the achievement for itself of a homeland and sovereign nationhood, and now the other seeks the same. Each people, in its time and with its troubles, has represented to the rest of the world an annoyance, an impediment. Roosevelt’s America turned away a shipload of Jews fleeing Nazi Germany and was otherwise ungenerous with visas for Jewish refugees fleeing for their lives. The Arab nations today, correspondingly, appear to wish that their Palestinian brethren would just get lost, and not be the occasion, even innocently, of sensational events that might unsettle their authoritarian regimes.

It is a human fact that when your views are "colored," as mine and Anne Bordonaro’s are, you may hear loudly the tolling of bells that other people don’t hear at all, or hear only faintly. Like most other Americans, I heard the "bells toll," fittingly, on NPR every hour and half hour, and in all other news media, on the day recently that a Jewish grandmother and her baby granddaughter were killed, simultaneously and atrociously, by a Palestinian suicide bomber. But when a Palestinian mother and her two small children were killed on almost the same day by an Israeli tank as they walked in a field near their home, the bells of our news media tolled only faintly.

We are penetrated every day by this lesson from our media, that the indiscriminate murders of Israelis are not only dreadful events, but are heart-rending and personal to us, as well. At the same time, the deaths of Palestinians, which now number three or four times more than the deaths of Israelis, are glossed over as though Palestinians were a lesser kind of being, belonging to the category "them," not "us." The numerical disparity between Palestinian wounded and Israeli wounded, it should be added, is far greater than the disparity between their respective deaths, on the order of 12 or 15 Palestinians for every Israeli; while the disparity in property damage, to the disadvantage of Palestinians, is incalculably large. Since the beginning of the current Intifada, 20 months ago, suicide bombings on Israeli soil have on the average occurred once a week, with the destruction of a bus here, a cafe there ... each one a unique horror. But the really heavy destruction of war, the kind wrought by massive fire from tanks, helicopters, and planes in assaults that run for hours and sometimes days, falls entirely on Palestinian soil and communities.

Are Palestinians somehow deserving of what they get from the muzzles of tanks and airships because their leader is reputed to be a fool? Or because they have the temerity to protest that the 22% of the original territory of Mandate Palestine that has been left to them by the all-powerful Israelis is daily encroached on by more and more Israeli settlers who are making themselves masters of the land and its water and roads, in flagrant violation of all international law? Or because, in this most absurd phrase of our era, some of them happen to be "in the wrong place at the wrong time" -- as though a bomb or shell or bullet had a superior claim to a given space than the humans who had lived and roamed there all their lives? Or do Palestinians deserve what they get because, simply by virtue of being Palestinians, they are in some way and by some reckoning either outright criminals or suspects, all three million of them?

Having confined and controlled and administratively criminalized the Palestinian people, the Israeli armed forces have popped smartly into the corresponding role of a relentless police force, systematically containing and policing and punishing the inmates of what has become surely the world’s largest prison camp.

Looking at this state of affairs -- a Palestinian ghetto surrounded by soldiers of the world's sixth most poweful army, who have the license to shoot and kill at small provocations -- am I correct in finding in this ghetto yet another expression of the Judaization of the Palestinian people at the hands of the Israeli state?

************************

When Rabbi Hillel was asked two thousand years ago if he could recite the whole wisdom of the Torah while standing on one foot, he replied, "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary."

Among the commentaries of this century, will there be any that take up the stark question of how the Jews of Israel, nominal descendants of the Hillel of blessed memory, could do today to their neighbors even one of the awful things that were done to their forbears a short half-century ago? If the Tenth and Unmentionable Thing has not been done and never will be done, does that make tolerable the two or three or four things, awful in the collective memory of Jews, that Jews themselves are now inflicting on their fellow Semites in the hacked up Palestinian territories where even the olive trees are being murdered? Has Israeli statecraft, finally, become so sealed up and armored in its proficiency and has the nation of Israel become so self-intoxicated, that memory of the events of the 1930's and ‘40's that scored our Jewish flesh unforgettably can have no place whatsoever in controlling our Jewish thoughts and actions today? .

Jules Rabin


About us | Articles | Events | Links | News | Letters to Media | Home | Top