More
distant than ever
Editorial, The Guardian,
October 31, 2002
Israel's crisis offers
little hope for peace:
Last night's shattering
of Israel's national
unity government creates
a new and potent source
of instability in
a region that can
scarcely afford it.
The immediate cause
of the rupture - disagreement
over the level of
government funding
for Jewish settlements
in the occupied territories
- will occasion some
wry smiles in places
such as Hebron and
Jenin. But any pleasure
Palestinians may take
in Israeli prime minister
Ariel Sharon's discomfiture
is likely to be short-lived.
Election
or not, the outlook
remains bleak
Editorial, The Independent,
October 31, 2002
Nothing could now
be worse for Israel,
let alone what remains
of the Middle East
peace process, than
that Ariel Sharon,
having lost the support
of the Israeli Labour
party in his unity
government, should
throw in his lot with
the religious zealots
and extremists on
the far right of Israeli
politics. Despite
all the provocations
of suicide bombers,
threats from Iraq
and the still vocal
hostility from other
Arab hardliners, the
Israeli people must
realise that such
a coalition would
prove the worst of
all worlds. A more
extreme administration
would close down any
possibility of dialogue
with the Palestinians
while provoking Hamas
and others into still
more atrocities.
The
dear high-maintenance
sons
By Nehemia Strasler,
Ha'aretz, October
31, 2002
One of the disputes
over the 2003 budget
is about state spending
on the settlers. The
Labor Party says their
funds should be cut,
but the finance minister
says the cuts already
been made across the
board affect everyone,
including the settlers.
Therefore, he says,
Labor's demands are
groundless, and there's
no way the treasury
can reverse the cutbacks
in pensions, the damage
done to single-parent
families, and the
reduced guaranteed
income payments -
because there's no
money available. However,
at times of crisis,
it's important to
examine everything.
So, is it right to
give so much money
to Sharon's "dear
sons?" And aren't
there any political-personal
reasons for the huge
budgets that do go
to the settlers, considering
the large proportion
of settlers who are
now members of the
Likud central committee
and voters in that
party's coming primaries?
No
legitimate terrorism
Editorial, Ha'aretz,
October 31, 2002
The murder of Linoi
Saroussi and Hadas
Turgeman, aged 14,
and Orna Eshel, by
a Fatah activist in
the Hermesh settlement
follows the bloody
attack in the Ariel
settlement's gas station,
which killed three,
and a series of attacks
against Israeli citizens
traveling on West
Bank roads. These
attacks indicate that
Palestinian terrorists
are adopting the approach
that Israelis living
beyond the Green Line,
or who happen to be
there, are legitimate
targets. This approach
was outlined by new
Palestinian Interior
Minister Hani al-Hassan,
who said (Ha'aretz,
October 29): "The
settlers cannot be
considered citizens"
because "they are
not in the right place,
they are armed, the
army makes use of
them and they kill
Palestinians." This
perception of settlers
is in line with statements
by leaders of the
most radical organizations,
who say all Israel
is "a military society"
in which there is
no distinction between
citizens and soldiers.
The entire Israeli
public, according
to this view, is "a
military public" and
therefore a legitimate
target.
A
white elephant on
the Green Line
By Akiva Eldar, Ha'aretz,
October 31, 2002
The terrorists' choice
of Ariel and Hermesh
was no accident. The
focus on the settlements
is a message from
the Palestinian organizations.
The new Palestinian
Interior Minister
Hani al-Hassan is
doing nothing to conceal
the message. In an
interview he gave
in these pages on
Tuesday, he explicitly
said the settlers
are not immune from
attacks. Shortly after
the Palestinian Legislative
Council gave its blessing
to Yasser Arafat's
decision to hand the
supreme command of
the Palestinian security
services to Hassan,
he chose a slightly
more diplomatic way
to put it: Occupation
and security don't
go together, he said.
Good-Byes
By Timothy Rothermel,
Palestine Chronicle,
October 30, 2002
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM
(PINA) - In the past
five days, I’ve
said good-bye to friends
in two extraordinarily
different ways, but
both have relevance
to life in the Middle
East in the current
situation and both
illustrate the tragedy
that is taking place
here – for all
concerned. The first
goodbye was to Michael,
over a good lunch
and with the warm
reminisces that have
characterized a friendship
of over two decades.
Michael and his charming
and highly intelligent
wife, an internationally
recognized professor
of biotechnology,
both in their 80s,
have left Jerusalem
for a new life in
Australia. Michael
had served as a senior
civil servant in his
government, holding
Ambassadorial ranks
in important countries
as well as in his
Foreign Ministry in
Jerusalem. They had
a comfortable retirement
life from a material
point of view, enjoying
the cultural, climatic
and social life of
a country in which
they were both born…in
Tel Aviv… before
the creation of the
State of Israel. Both
decided that the conditions
to which Palestinians,
from within Israel
and, more importantly,
those under occupation
were treated, as well
as other internal
social developments
in their country made
emigration an imperative.
In
Exile - Bethlehem
to Gaza
By Kristen Ess, Palestine
Chronicle, October
30, 2002
GAZA CITY (PINA) -
In Bethlehem the air
in the streets is
hesitatingly chaotic.
It cannot recover
from the 2 month long
invasion of the Bethlehem
area while under a
constant Israeli military
occupation. Most residents
are not allowed to
leave, surrounded
by Israeli checkpoints,
illegal settlements,
and settler by-pass
roads chopping up
and choking the area.
Despite the international
media reports that
it was a day of celebration
in Bethlehem when
the Israeli military
ended its siege on
the Church of Nativity
in April, I have yet
to locate anyone who
did not experience
the day as intensely
tragic. Although Israel
ignored UN Security
Resolution 1402 demanding
its withdrawal from
West Bank cities,
including Bethlehem
and the Church of
Nativity, they did
not leave the center
of Bethlehem until
over a month later,
taking with them many
Palestinians who were
banished from their
homes, families, their
homeland. I have been
repeatedly told that
it was the end of
the hope.
Injustice
by Omission
By Steven Salaita,
Palestine Chronicle,
October 30, 2002
The red trails trickled
slowly, methodically,
into puddles of blood.
The furious September
sun would dry those
puddles into crimson
tombstones weighing
heavily on the earth
in Sabra and Shatila.
Each droplet that
helped construct the
red mounds now resting
underneath the dusty
land tells a story
of terror and mutilation.
We rarely hear those
stories in the United
States. One story
is particularly infamous,
memorable, and unforgivable.
It was offered by
the woman who shared
her unborn son with
the earth so the world
would never forget
his existence. He
was ripped from her
stomach with a machete.
He was paraded on
a blade tip around
Shatila's rubble.
He was later tossed
into a mass grave,
a tiny body marbled
with blood, still
awaiting the miracle
of parturition. People
still tell his story
in Shatila.